- Thread starter
- #321
No, it’s a glossy smooth finish on the bottom.does the underside of the splitter have the same texture on it?
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
No, it’s a glossy smooth finish on the bottom.does the underside of the splitter have the same texture on it?
I agree. It looks like a lot of straight line, hard brake, sharp turn, repeat.View attachment 91681
With all the point and shoot corners I think I’d call it:
”Shotgun.”
Personally, Id rather see more sweepers and let the cars roll…..all these “brake waster” turns are a pain in the wallet. Why burn up tires and brakes just to go slow? Let them go I say……but, I noticed that nobody’s asking me so….
Regardless, I’m glad to see this moving forward.
I would like to try it out, maybe I’ll see some of your shining faces next year.
I think if the corners have heavy banking and wide curbs so you can carry lots of speed, this track has some great potential for lower HP cars (miatas, brz's, etc.). But for HP dominated cars, I agree the track does not appear to have much flow or momentum. For once maybe I will actually enjoy the lack of power in my car?!?!View attachment 91681
With all the point and shoot corners I think I’d call it:
”Shotgun.”
Personally, Id rather see more sweepers and let the cars roll…..all these “brake waster” turns are a pain in the wallet. Why burn up tires and brakes just to go slow? Let them go I say……but, I noticed that nobody’s asking me so….
Regardless, I’m glad to see this moving forward.
I would like to try it out, maybe I’ll see some of your shining faces next year.
I don't know why people think point and shoot tracks are good for low power cars, I would think they would suffer most from the start/stop nature of these tracks.I think if the corners have heavy banking and wide curbs so you can carry lots of speed, this track has some great potential for lower HP cars (miatas, brz's, etc.). But for HP dominated cars, I agree the track does not appear to have much flow or momentum. For once maybe I will actually enjoy the lack of power in my car?!?!
Between the Laguna repave, new BRP track and the Sonoma repave coming in January, it absolutely warms my heart to see this much support for tracks in CA when we hear so many stories about tracks closing down.
I agree, I was commenting on the assumption that a low hp car would have a less severe speed delta on a point and shoot track vs. a high horsepower carI don't know why people think point and shoot tracks are good for low power cars, I would think they would suffer most from the start/stop nature of these tracks.
Low power cars are momentum cars, so I would think that tracks that flow better (ergo maintain momentum) would be where they would shine most.
High power cars accelerate much faster and could deal with the point and shoot.....
BUT.....that my opinion. Maybe I'm wrong here.
I was making a general statement about these types of tracks....I frequently hear how low power cars are momentum cars but then why would you want to kill that momentum?I agree, I was commenting on the assumption that a low hp car would have a less severe speed delta on a point and shoot track vs. a high horsepower car
IE a miata hitting 95mph down the front straight and only having to slow down to 85mph for T1, that's essentially a dab of the brakes and a lift, 10mph delta. From the drivers seat, very momentum-y.
Vs. a mustang hitting 125mph down the front straight and then having to slow down to 80mph. That is a speed delta of 45mph, which could give the feeling of "killing" your momentum from the drivers seat. And this new BRP track it looks like you'll have to do that for nearly every turn.
Less momentum has to be killed because they don't need to slow down as much is how I (perhaps wrongly) interpret itI was making a general statement about these types of tracks....I frequently hear how low power cars are momentum cars but then why would you want to kill that momentum?
Probably something I don't understand about this because I've heard that over and over and it just doesn't make sense to me.
absolutely, 100% agree. A slow car getting in the way of your corner leads to so much time lost when you are in a slow car like that!Okay here's my frame of reference:
My first ever stockcar had gears that were way to tall and a cam that was way to big.
It didn't pull at all off the corners but just as you were ready to shut down for the corner it would start pulling like a banshee.
Now as long as I had free track in front of me I was as fast as anyone and faster than most, but as soon as someone got in my way it would take me 3 laps to get back up to speed.
This is how I imagine a Miata is on tracks with long straights and super tight corners.
Okay, now this is where I say something that will get me into trouble....but this is my personal experience:Less momentum has to be killed because they don't need to slow down as much is how I (perhaps wrongly) interpret it
They were going slower in the first place on straight
AND they are light and nimble so have high cornering speeds
T1 at Thunderhill for example; my top speed on the main straight is ~118mph. My min speed for T1 is 90.1mph.
A spec miata hits about 105mph on the front straight and slows to ~90mph for T1.
I had to lose 28mph while the spec miata had to only lose 15mph. From a drivers seat perspective, losing 28mph feels like more of a momentum loss than 15mph. IDK if it actually is, and I'm not a wheel to wheel guy, so can only comment from what I "feel".
absolutely, 100% agree. A slow car getting in the way of your corner leads to so much time lost when you are in a slow car like that!
It was the same for me when my car was still wearing skinny tires and license plates. Again, just my experience. Probably not the best example….But you're a very good driver in a very well-developed car. I think "off the street" in an HPDE-style event is where you see more of the "fast in the corners" Miata / BRZ86 vs "quick on the straight" Mustang / Corvette paradigm.
I also think it's somewhat of an optical illusion for a chasing Miata, as increasing velocity means increased distance for the same time gap. It appears the Mustang is pulling away down the straight and the Miata is catching up under braking & in the corner, but if you put a stopwatch on it the actual time gap might be the same all the time. Or at least less than the change in distance makes it appear.
I could get into trouble myself here so I’ll leave it to say that they are pesky mosquitoes at times.Okay, now this is where I say something that will get me into trouble....but this is my personal experience:
For all the talk I hear about how much faster Miata's are in the corners than a big old mustang, I have yet to be passed by one.
They are like the bumpers in pinball, always in the way. At no time, at any track in any corner, in my experience has it ever been close.
But, that is just my experience. Your mileage my vary.
That's one of the nicest things anyone has said to me in a long time.But you're a very good driver in a very well-developed car.
Any pics of this installed yet? It looks great!No, it’s a glossy smooth finish on the bottom.
It’s 1/2” resin filled birch. Not sure on the weight. Definitely heavier than the Alumalite versions I was running previously, but way more rigid and effective.Wow, that's pretty thick! How much does it weigh?